Alex Holcombe's blog

open science, open access, meta-science, perception, neuroscience, …

Scholarly publishers and their high profits

with 10 comments

I recently published the below chart to document the outrageous profit margins of scholarly publishers in the sciences.

Screen Shot 2013-01-09 at 12.35.26 PM

This post is to provide the sources for the numbers in the chart.

The Woolworths number comes from their website, where they write “As a group, Woolworths Limited makes less than seven cents in the dollar before we then pay interest and tax”.

The Rio Tinto figure of 23% is based on the operating profit they report divided by the consolidated sales revenue in their 2011 financial summary.

Apple’s profit of 35% is based on these numbers, dividing their operating income for the year ending September 2012 of 55.2 billion by the revenue for the same period of 156.5 billion.

The 34% number for Springer comes from Heather Morrison’s PhD thesis, in which she writes that “Springer’s Science + Business Media (2010) reported a return on sales (operating profit) of 33.9% or € 294 million on revenue of € 866 million, an increase of 4% over the profit of the previous year.”

For Elsevier, I used the figure reported by investment analyst Claudio Aspesi.

For Wiley, I again used Heather Morrison’s analysis in her thesis, based on $99 million in profit on $245 million in revenue.

Thanks to Nick Scott-Samuel and Mike Taylor.

About these ads

Written by alexholcombe

January 9, 2013 at 4:05 pm

Posted in academia, open access

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. The link to the PhD thesis of Heather Morrison does not work :(

    Chris Filo Gorgolewski

    December 20, 2013 at 4:13 am

  2. Thanks, couldn’t find where it is now to her explanatory comment (if it still exists), so I replaced the link with one to her thesis excerpt.

    alexholcombe

    December 20, 2013 at 5:37 am

  3. Big presses like Elsevier–whose name has been mud since I first heard it–but small scholarly presses struggle; they provide a good service and frankly I do worry about their ability to survive.

    Ben Canard

    March 24, 2014 at 1:43 pm

  4. […] who owns this course? Of course, one group still seems to find academia a profitable enterprise—the corporate publishers. And with the writing and editing processes taken care of, what’s left to outsource to free […]

  5. […] “Scholarly publishers and their high profits” http://alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/s … […]

  6. Reblogged this on In the Dark and commented:
    Lest we forget the Great Academic Publishing Ripoff…

    telescoper

    March 25, 2014 at 10:54 pm

  7. Heather Morrison’s thesis is available via http://summit.sfu.ca/item/12537 and the reference is on page 2.

    ms8marple

    March 27, 2014 at 2:28 am

  8. […] digital research repository co-ordinator, and a TEU member, says scholarly publishers make huge profits from the voluntary labour of academic staff, who write articles, edit journals and contribute to […]

  9. Apple has horded cash, dodged taxes, purchased rare earth materials from conflict areas — it has been a terrible corporate citizen and academics (at least looking around VSS in the past) have been funding this behavior.

    I’m curious, what do the scholarly publishers typically do with their profits? Are they innovating, archiving, and researching better ways to disseminate knowledge?

  10. […] for the big academic publishers? Yeah, not so much. Sheesh. Alex Holcombe on how any worries may be […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 766 other followers